By Travis
K.J. Williamson , James T. Gibbs , and Julie M. Kramer
INTRODUCTION
The Navy performed an interim
remedial action to reduce gasoline concentrations in soil and
groundwater at the Department of Defense Housing Facility (DoDHF)
Former Underground Storage Tank (UST) Site 957/970 in Novato,
California. The project was funded by Southwest Division,
Naval Facilities Engineering Command in San Diego, California
through the Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC)
in Port Hueneme, California. The interim remedial action
consisted of in situ air sparging with soil vapor extraction (IAS/SVE).
The system focused on four zones where maximum concentrations
of benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and total xylenes (BTEX)
had been detected in groundwater. The remedial action was
initially targeted primarily at the removal of BTEX
components; however, the concentrations of methyl-tert-butyl
ether (MTBE) in both groundwater and the extracted vapor
stream were monitored closely during system operation. As
remedial activities progressed, MTBE became a greater concern
among the scientific and regulatory community; therefore, its
removal became more central to the specific remedial
objectives at the Site. Results indicated that a conventional
treatment technology designed for the removal of BTEX was also
effective for significant removal of dissolved MTBE. The
results of the remedial action that pertain to removal of
dissolved MTBE are the focus of this paper.
SITE HISTORY
DoDHF Novato is located on
former Hamilton Air Force Base (AFB) property in Novato,
California, approximately 20 miles north of San Francisco. The
Navy took over many of the housing units located on a portion
of the Base and established DoDHF Novato. The Navy-occupied
portion also included various operations to support the
housing facility, including a Navy Exchange (NEX) gas station
and Public Works Center (PWC) gas station (Figure 1) that were
in use from the mid-1970s to the early 1990s. At that time,
the gas stations were closed and the USTs that had previously
stored gasoline were removed. The Navy-owned portion of the
Site, now designated Former UST Site 957/970, comprises an
area of approximately 13 acres of land (an approximate
rectangle with dimensions 1,100 ft by 500 ft).
GROUNDWATER
AND SUBSURFACE CHARACTERISTICS
Prior to removal of USTs from
Former UST Site 957/970, gasoline releases impacted soils near
some of the tanks and reached the groundwater in the shallow
aquifer. In addition to typical organic compounds in gasoline
such as BTEX, MTBE has been detected in groundwater at the
Site. MTBE is a gasoline oxygenate that has been added to
gasoline since the late 1970s and is a common constituent of
Reformulated Gasoline (RfG) and California’s Cleaner Burning
Gasoline. MTBE in groundwater originates from the former NEX
gas station and extends to the north of the Navy property.
BTEX compounds in groundwater are limited to the Navy
property, and four years of quarterly groundwater monitoring
have shown that these gasoline constituents are stable and
that concentrations are decreasing over time. The extent of
dissolved MTBE and benzene in groundwater is shown in Figure
1. The discussion of MTBE removal at the Site will be limited
to the extent of the benzene plume, because this is the only
portion of the MTBE plume that was actively treated by the IAS/SVE
system.
The geology at the Site is
heterogeneous, with sands and clay encountered in different
proportions and at varying depths across the Site. Bedrock
typically is encountered at 15 to 20 ft below ground surface (bgs)
and increases in depth to the north of the Site. The bedrock
underlies a shallow, thin aquifer encountered at about 9 ft
bgs. A permeable sandy layer of varying thickness and depth
was encountered in a majority of the borings during system
installation. The aquifer zone is located in this permeable,
sandy layer, throughout which the water table elevation
fluctuates. Hydrocarbon-contaminated soils were encountered
mostly in this permeable zone, with the majority of sorbed
gasoline found in the smear zone formed by water level
fluctuations and the initial release. The relative
permeability of this zone, which contained the greatest levels
of hydrocarbon impact, also made it the zone that is most
conducive to effective air sparging.
IN SITU AIR
SPARGING AND SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION
A coupled IAS/SVE system was
installed to reduce the mass of hydrocarbons in selected areas
having elevated concentrations. The goal of the interim action
was aggressive treatment and removal of “hot spot” areas and
mass reduction of BTEX constituents, thereby reducing the
potential of the groundwater plume to migrate. The interim
action was not initially focused on MTBE, although it was
known from past investigations to be present at the Site. Even
though the interim action was not designed specifically for
MTBE removal, MTBE was monitored in both extracted vapor and
sampled groundwater throughout the duration of remedial
activities. The IAS/SVE system operated at the Site from June
1998 to October 1999.
IAS is the injection of
pressurized air directly into an aquifer. The injected air
delivers oxygen to the groundwater and strips volatile
contaminants from the groundwater. The air flows through
permeable pathways in the saturated soil column driven toward
the water table surface by buoyant forces. The shape and
nature of the airflow pathways are determined by soil particle
and sediment layering characteristics.
IAS removes hydrocarbons from
saturated soil sediments by two primary mechanisms: (1)
biodegradation: increased dissolved oxygen (DO) supports and
enhances in situ biodegradation of hydrocarbons by indigenous
microbes, and (2) stripping: volatile hydrocarbons partition
into the vapor phase and are carried to the vadose zone with
the air stream. The relative contributions of each of these
removal mechanisms are dependent on site characteristics,
contaminant type and concentration, subsurface microbiology,
system design, and operational parameters. During the
operational period of the IAS/SVE at Former UST Site 957/970,
it was thought that MTBE could not be effectively biodegraded
or stripped because MTBE did not appear to be readily
biodegradable at this Site, and because of its low Henry’s Law
Constant compared to other common gasoline constituents (i.e.,
BTEX). The discussion of results from IAS/SVE system operation
at the Former UST Site 957/970 that follows indicates MTBE was
likely removed by both biodegradation and stripping.
SVE systems are commonly
coupled to IAS systems where the biodegradation capacity of
the vadose zone is inadequate or unknown, or where the solutes
to be removed are known to be recalcitrant to aerobic
biodegradation, and where regulations do not permit the
atmospheric release of the volatilized compounds of interest.
The SVE system consisted of wells screened in the vadose zone
and an extraction blower that imposed a vacuum on the soil
voids near the well. Vapor was withdrawn to the surface and
treated by a Vapor Check Vac 50 with a 500-scfm flow capacity
prior to discharge.
The IAS/SVE system initially
consisted of 10 air sparging wells and 6 SVE wells installed
in May 1998. Sparge wells were screened as low as possible in
the saturated permeable layer to allow air to traverse the
maximum possible vertical distance through the aquifer
sediments. SVE wells were screened in the vadose zone and
across the water table to accommodate fluctuations in
groundwater levels. Subsequent groundwater monitoring events
revealed areas of elevated hydrocarbon concentrations outside
of the areas for which the original air sparging and SVE
systems were designed. For this reason, eight additional
sparge wells and seven additional SVE wells were installed in
October 1998 to remove gasoline from these areas.
RESULTS
Significant mass removal of
MTBE was achieved through the operation of the air sparging
and soil vapor extraction systems. As mentioned above, removal
likely occurred through both biodegradation in the subsurface
and stripping of volatile hydrocarbons which were captured by
the SVE system and treated. Figure 2 shows the mass of
gasoline and MTBE removed by the SVE system based on measured
flowrates and hydrocarbon concentrations in the extracted
vapor stream. The figure shows that approximately 10,000 kg
and 450 kg of gasoline and MTBE, respectively, were calculated
to have been removed through the SVE system. Note that these
values are only indicative of the removal through stripping
and do not account for removal that occurred in the subsurface
as a result of biodegradation.
Groundwater monitoring was
performed to determine the direct effect of IAS/SVE on
groundwater concentrations. Groundwater samples were collected
from monitoring wells and air sparging wells prior to startup
of remedial activities to establish baseline concentrations.
The initial (preremediation) sampling took place in May 1998.
Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring and sparge
wells again one year later (May 1999) and analyzed to
determine the effects of remedial activities on groundwater
concentrations. Air sparging wells were allowed to equilibrate
for approximately one week prior to groundwater sampling.
System expansion wells were not installed until October 1998;
therefore, initial sampling data for these wells was conducted
in November 1998, and the corresponding one-year sampling
event took place in November 1999. Quarterly groundwater
monitoring events were conducted between the baseline and
annual monitoring; however, these sampling events consisted
only of nearby monitoring wells and not the sparge wells
because the system wells could not be monitored while
operational.
Figure 3 shows groundwater MTBE
concentrations in the immediate vicinity of the former NEX
source area in a well located approximately 10 ft downgradient
of the former NEX UST complex. Figure 4 shows groundwater MTBE
concentrations in a well located approximately 250 ft
downgradient from the former NEX UST complex. Groundwater
monitoring results show that MTBE concentrations decreased
significantly in the area of the former NEX gas station
following one year of system operation (Figures 3 and 4,
respectively). Groundwater concentrations in the well located
in the immediate vicinity of the former NEX source area
started at 190,000 µg/L of MTBE preceding system operation
(Figure 3). After one year of operation, the concentration of
MTBE in the same well decreased to 2,200 µg/L. This decrease
represents a reduction of approximately 99% MTBE in this
particular well as a result of only one year of operation.
Note that Figure 3 shows MTBE concentrations increased
slightly immediately after the IAS/SVE system was shut down
due to diminishing returns. This slight increase of MTBE
concentrations can be attributed to seasonal variations (i.e.,
the system was shut down during the dry season), and Figure 3
shows concentrations have decreased and remained at low levels
over two years of quarterly monitoring. This long-term
concentration trend indicates that rebound of gasoline
constituents near the former NEX source area is not occurring.
Groundwater concentrations in a monitoring well located
approximately 250 ft downgradient of the former NEX source
area showed a similar reduction to that observed in the
immediate vicinity of the source area (Figure 4).
A microcosm study was performed
using native soil and groundwater from the Former UST Site
957/970 to determine whether biodegradation of MTBE could
occur at the Site (Magar et al., 2001). Results of the study
showed that the indigenous microbes that exist in the native
media were capable of aerobic MTBE biodegradation. These
results can help to understand the decreasing MTBE
concentration trends illustrated in Figure 5, which shows MTBE
isoconcentration maps in the area of the Site influenced by
the IAS/SVE system. Figures 5a and 5b show the MTBE
concentrations in groundwater before and after IAS/SVE system
operation, respectively. By comparing the two figures it is
evident that the active treatment system was effective at
decreasing MTBE concentrations. Figure 5c shows MTBE
concentrations in groundwater two years after the active
treatment system was shut down and indicates that MTBE
concentrations did not rebound and continued to decrease
without active remediation. This post-shutdown MTBE loss is
attributed to aerobic MTBE biodegradation.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the interim remedial
action system was designed to remove elevated levels of BTEX
compounds, results showed that the system effectively removed
significant MTBE mass. The MTBE removal was confirmed by the
presence of MTBE in the extracted vapor stream and by the
reduction of MTBE groundwater concentrations. In addition to
significant groundwater concentration reductions during system
operation, MTBE concentrations did not rebound and continued
to decrease for two years after system operation stopped. The
aggressive treatment of “hot spot” areas resulted in treatment
to levels below those required to be protective of human
health for the intended future site use (Battelle, 2001).
Although specialized technologies are being developed to treat
MTBE due to its unique characteristics, it should be noted
that in some cases significant removal can be achieved with
conventional treatment technologies such as IAS/SVE.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Thomas
Macchiarella, the Navy BRAC Environmental Coordinator
directing the work at Novato, for his contributions to
technical decision-making and his ability to transform project
and risk management needs into specific and unambiguous
directions. Thanks also to James Hicks of Battelle for the
many hours spent constructing volume and mass estimates.
REFERENCES
Battelle. 2001. “Final
Revised Risk Assessment for Former UST Site 957/970 at
Department of Defense Housing Facility, Novato, California.”
Prepared for the Southwest Division, Naval Facilities
Engineering Command under NFESC Contract No. N47408-95-D-0730.
June 8.
Magar, V., K. Hartzell, C.
Burton, J. Gibbs. 2001. “Aerobic and Cometabolic MTBE
Biodegradation at the Novato and Port Hueneme Test Site.”
Journal of Environmental Engineering. (submitted for
publication December 2001).
Click to enlarge
FIGURE 1. Sitemap of DoDHF
Novato
click to enlarge
FIGURE 2.
Cumulative mass of gasoline and
MTBE removed by the SVE system.
click to enlarge
FIGURE 3.
Former NEX source area MTBE concentrations over time.
click to enlarge
FIGURE 4.
MTBE concentrations over time downgradient of former NEX
source area.
click to enlarge
FIGURE 5.
MTBE plume contours a) prior to IAS/SVE treatment, b)
immediately after IAS/SVE shut down, and c) two years after
IAS/SVE shut down.
|