Daniela Franco Carvalho JACOBUCCI; Claudia Kelly VASCONCELOS;
Ani Beatriz MATSUURA; Fabiana André FALCONI
and
Lucia Regina DURRANT
Food Engineering Faculty,
Campinas
State
University – UNICAMP
Campinas,
Brazil.
E-mail:
durrant@fea.unicamp.br
Surfactants
are amphiphilic molecules, consisting of hydrophilic and
hydrophobic domains, which tend to partition preferentially at
the interface between fluids of different degrees of polarity
and hydrogen bonding. Due to their unique interfacial
behavior, surfactants find applications in various industrial
processes involving emulsification, foaming, detergency,
wetting and phase dispersion or solubilization (Lin at al.,
1998).
In
bioremediation processes, they can promote the biodegradation
of hydrophobic pollutants such as hydrocarbons by
emulsification and solubilization (De¨ziel at al.,
1999).
Crude oil hydrocarbons are highly hydrophobic
materials that can hardly be degraded or decomposed due to
their poor availability to microorganisms. The solubilization
of hydrocarbons may be restrained by their existence in oil
matrix and may be also dependent on the attachment of
microorganisms to oil surface. Thus the direct contact of
cells with the surface of oil is thought to be important in
the bioremediation of contaminated area with crude oil (Choi
at al., 1999). Biosynthesis and excretion of
biosurfactants into the medium are considered to be another
cell mechanism aiming at an adaptation of the microorganism
for using external lipophilic compounds as carbon and energy
sources.
Biosurfactants are produced mainly by
aerobically growing microorganisms in aqueous media from a
carbon source feedstock, e.g. carbohydrates, hydrocarbons,
oils and fats or of mixtures thereof. The emulsifiers are
secreted into the culture medium during the growth of the
microorganism and assist in the transport and translocation of
the insoluble substrates across the membranes.
Several petroleum aliphatic and polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons can act as source of carbon and energy
for the growth of microorganisms. One main factor that
influences the extent of their biodegradation is their
bioavailability and this is a priority research objective in
the bioremediation field (Bardi et al., 2000).
Crude
oil contains mutagenic, carcinogenic, growth inhibitory
compounds, which can cause severe damage to aquatic and
terrestrial environment. It is estimated that 0.08–0.46% of
the total oil production is wasted to the environment,
eventually causing pollution to waters and shores.
Surface-active agents assist in the degradation of hydrocarbon
pollutants by facilitating the desorption from the soil
and/or by dispersing in small droplets that are more
easily attacked by microorganisms (Bognolo, 1999).
‘Hydrocarbono-clastic’ microorganisms often make and secrete
one or more surface-active agents (bio-surfactants and/or
bioemulsifiers). Any new or unexamined hydrocarbonoclastic
environmental isolate offers a potential for the discovery of
a new biosurfactant structure (Esch et al., 1999).
In the oil field, the two basic types of
emulsions are water-in-oil (w/o) and oil-in-water (o/w). More
than 95% of the crude oil emulsion formed in the oil field are
of the w/o type (Ali & Algam, 2000).
Petroleum fuel
spills have resulted in accumulation of petroleum products at
refineries, fuel storage areas, airports, military bases and
gasoline service stations. If these compounds are introduced
to the environment at high concentrations (e.g. spills), the
problem with recalcitrance to microbial degradation is
considerably enhanced. Currently, considerable effort is being
spent to design cheap and feasible strategies for the clean up
of contaminated sites. Bioremediation, in particular, shows
promise as a relatively cheap clean-up strategy. In situ
bioremediation by indigenous microbial population is an
increasingly popular option for clean up of sites with readily
degradable contaminants (Jansson et al., 2000).
The COD (Chemical
Oxygen Demand) and BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) are
indirect parameters to determine the pollution of industrial
effluents. Treatments that could contribute to low COD or BOD
values are of interest to industries (Von Sperlins, 1996).
The purpose of this research was to analyze the
use of bacteria and/or their biosurfactants to bioremediate
oily industrial effluents, through the determination of
biosurfactant activities and of COD reduction.
1. Material
and Methods
Isolation of Microbial Strains:
Samples from soil contaminated with diesel oil were collected
near Paulinia's petroleum refinery in Campinas (SP, Brazil),
and used for the isolation of microorganisms as follows:
homogenization of soil samples, surface plating, incubation at
30
0C
and isolation of pure colonies.
Identification and Maintenance
of the Bacterial Strains:
For the tentative identification of the five bacteria,
various biochemical tests were undertaken and observation was
made of all morphological characteristics (Holt et al.,
1994). The isolated bacterial strains were identified as
Acinetobacter
calcoaceticus (5C2), Flavobacterium sp (5B4),
Moraxella nonliquefaciens (5E2), Pantoea agglomerans
(Pa) and Planococcus citreus (Pc). All strains
were maintained in Nutrient agar, with the exception for
Planococcus citreus, with was in YPD agar.
Culture Conditions:
The bacteria were cultivated in a medium containing either 3%,
5%, 15% or 30% (vol/vol) of petroleum derived compounds
(kerosene, toluene or vaseline) obtained from FLUKA and diesel
oil from TEXACO as the carbon source plus 0.5 g MgSO4,
3.0 g NaNO3, 1.0 g KH2PO4,
1.0 g yeast extract and 0,3 g peptone per liter of medium.
Cultures were grown in 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 50 mL of
medium and incubated with shaking (150 rpm) at 30
0C. Duplicate
flasks were collected at 48, 72 and 120 hours of incubation
and the emulsification activities were determined as described
below. Non-inoculated flasks were also incubated under the
same conditions and were used as control.
Emulsification Activities
Measurements: Culture broth was made
cell free by centrifugation. 3.5 ml of the cell free broth was
vigorously shaken with 2.0 ml of toluene, xylene or diesel oil
on a vortex shaker and left undisturbed. After one hour,
optical density of the oil-in-water emulsion phase was
measured at 610 nm. The O.D. was reported as emulsification
activity (Johnson et al., 1992). After 24 hours the
height of the emulsion layer (water-in-oil) was measured and
emulsification activity was expressed in cm (Cooper &
Goldenberg, 1987). The test tubes utilized for activities
measurements have diameters of 1.0 cm, producing a 2.0 cm
substrate layer, which corresponds to 2 ml of tested
substrate.
Biosurfactants production:
The
selected bacteria Pantoea agglomerans and
Planococcus citreus were cultivated in a medium containing
1.5% (vol/vol) of kerosene and olive oil, respectively, plus
0.5 g MgSO4, 3.0 g NaNO3, 1.0 g KH2PO4,
1.0 g yeast extract and 0.3 g peptone per liter of medium.
Cultures were grown in 500
ml Erlenmeyer flasks with 300 ml of medium and incubated with
shaking (150 rpm) at 30
0C
for 48 hours.
Biosurfactants isolation:
Culture broth was made cell free by centrifugation at
9.000 rpm during 15 minutes. The biosurfactants were isolated
(Rocha et al., 1992), lyophilized and maintained on
dessecador.
Bioremediation assays:
Oily effluent was obtained from a truck garage
near Campinas city, São Paulo - Brazil and the bioremediation
assays were carried out using Pantoea agglomerans and
Planococcus citreus.
Six
experiments were developed: 1a) 10
ml of
Pantoea agglomerans was added to 50 ml effluent; 1b)
10 ml of Planococcus citreus was added to 50 ml
effluent; 2) 5 ml of Pantoea agglomerans and 5 ml
of Planococcus citreus were added simultaneously to
50ml effluent; 3a) 0.25 g biosurfactant isolated
produced by Pantoea agglomerans was added to 50 ml
effluent; 3b) 0.25 g biosurfactant isolated produced by
Planococcus citreus was added to 50 ml effluent; 4)
0.125 g of each biosurfactant was added to 50 ml effluent. Samples
were collected at 0, 24, 48, 72 and 120 hours of incubation at
150 rpm, 30° C.
COD reduction:
COD determination was carried out utilizing potassium
dichromate as oxidant agent (Greenberg et al., 1992) in
a COD reactor Model 2000, Hach Company. The COD reduction
percentage was established as the difference among samples
value and samples value at zero time. The COD reduction was
determined on the six-bioremediation assays at 24, 48, 72 and
120 hours.
Oily Effluent Biodegradation:
The oily effluent
biodegradation, were determined with a Shimadzu GC-14A
capillary gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization
detector (FID), a split/splitless injector and a Supelcowax-10
Supelco column (30m, 0.53mm ID, 1mm
film thickness).
Gas Chromatographic
conditions:
The analysis were realized
with a 280ºC detector, 250ºC injector, split ratio on 50:1,
carrier gas helium flow rate of 20cm/s and samples of 1mL
injection. The column temperature was programmed as initial
temperature of 40ºC held for 5 minutes, and then increased at
a rate of 5ºC/min and final temperature 200ºC for 5 minutes.
2. Results
Figure 1 shows the best results obtained for
the bacterial strains grown on 5%, 15% and 30% of the carbon
sources, i.e., emulsification activities higher than 0.2 for
oil-in-water emulsions.
Click image to
enlarge
Figure 1:
Oil-in-water emulsification activities in the cell-free
culture fluids of the bacterial strains grown and tested on
diesel oil. 5B4: Flavobacterium sp; 5C2:
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus; 5E2: Moraxella
nonliquefaciens; Pc: Planococcus citreus.
Figure 2 shows the best
results obtained when Pantoea agglomerans was grown for
72 hours on 3% and 5% of the carbon sources, i.e.,
emulsification activities higher than 1 cm for water-in-oil
emulsions.
Click image to
enlarge
Figure 2:
Water-in-oil emulsification
activities in the cell-free culture fluids of the Pantoea
agglomerans. K=kerosene, T=toluene, X=xylene.

Figure 3 shows the
results obtained when the bacterial strains were grown on 5%,
15% and 30% of diesel oil,
i.e., emulsification activities higher than 1 cm for
water-in-oil emulsions.


Figure 3:
Water-in-oil emulsification
activities in the cell-free culture fluids of the bacterial
strains. Legends: time of incubation. A: data from
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus; B: data from
Flavobacterium sp; C: data from
Moraxella nonliquefaciens.
Figure 4 shows
the biosurfactant production by Pantoea agglomerans and
Planococcus citreus.

Figure 4:
Biosurfactant
production by Pantoea agglomerans and Planococcus
citreus after 48 hours of incubation.
Figures 5
and 6 show the COD reduction obtained after bioremediation
assays with Pantoea agglomerans and Planococcus citreus
and their isolated lyophilized biosurfactants.
Click image to
enlarge
Figure 5:
Oily effluent
COD reduction (%) after bioremediation assays 1a (Planococcus
citreus strain), 1b (Pantoea agglomerans strain)
and 2 (bacterial strains consortium).
Click image to
enlarge
Figure 6:
Oily effluent COD reduction (%) after bioremediation assays 3a
(Planococcus citreus biosurfactant), 3b (Pantoea
agglomerans biosurfactant) and 2 (bacterial biosurfactant
consortium).
The biodegradation
of the oily effluent after the various bioremediation assays,
which was expressed as the percentages of the peak reduction
areas following the analyses by gas chromatography, are
demonstrated in figure 7 (A and B).


Figure 7:
Oily effluent
biodegradation during 24 hours (A) and 120 hours (B) of
bioremediation assays analyzed by gas chromatography.
Bioremediation Assays: 1a) 10 ml of Pantoea agglomerans;
1b) 10 ml of Planococcus citreus; 2) 5 ml of
Pantoea agglomerans and 5 ml of Planococcus citreus;
3a) 0.25 g biosurfactant isolated produced by Pantoea
agglomerans; 3b) 0.25 g biosurfactant isolated produced by
Planococcus citreus; 4) 0.125 g of each biosurfactant.
1.Discussion
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus,
Flavobacterium sp and Moraxella nonliquefaciens
were able to produce a significant amount of biosurfactants
detected by water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions, during
their growth on different percentages of diesel oil.
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus showed good results (halos
higher than 2.0 cm), when grown for 120 hours in diesel oil
concentrations up to 5%. Moraxella nonliquefaciens
showed good emulsification activities detected by absorbance
increased when grown on 3% and 5% of diesel oil for 120 hours
and water-in-oil emulsions when grown on 5% and 15% of diesel
for 120 hours of incubation.
Apparently higher diesel oil concentrations
stimulated the biosurfactant production by Flavobacterium
sp, Fig. 3 (B).
As could be noted in Fig. 1 (A), Planococcus
citreus grew better on kerosene and vaseline that resulted
in significant oil-in-water emulsification. Planococcus
citreus emulsified all the diesel oil present in the
growth medium, regardless of the concentration used and of the
incubation period. Unexpectedly, low emulsification activities
were obtained from this strain at the incubation time tested.
Probably, the greater amount of biosurfactant produced by
Planococcus citreus was released to culture medium during
the first hours of incubation, being utilized to emulsify the
diesel oil present in the culture medium.
Pantoea
agglomerans showed best results on kerosene, toleuene and
vaseline as the carbon sources for growth, in different
concentrations (3% and 5%). Significant results were obtained
at 48 hours of incubation, detected by higher halos superior
than 1.5 cm.
Planococcus
citreus and Pantoea agglomerans produced 2 g/L and
0.7 g/L biosurfactants, respectively, during 48 hours of
incubation in a oily medium. These amounts of biosurfactant
obtained are significant when compared to the production of
the well-known Alasan (2.2 g/L in 2.5-liter fermentor), (Navon-Venezia
et. al., 1995).
The higher COD
reduction of the effluent occurred following growth of
Planococcus citreus for 120 hours (Fig. 5). When the
mixture of the bacteria biosurfactants was used, a significant
COD reduction was detected after 48 hours of incubation (Fig.
6). As biosurfactants do not degrade the oily compounds but
emulsify it into small oil drops (Àscon-Cabrera & Lebeault,
1995), these results of COD reduction could be explained by
the utilization of immediately emulsified oily compounds by
indigenous microorganisms present in the effluent, which was
not autoclaved.
A significant
reduction on most of the peaks areas of the CG chromatograms
was observed following the bioremediation assays, indicating
that these treatments were effective. During the first 24
hours of incubation, every bioremediation assay showed a
tendency to reduce peaks areas, indicating that biodegradation
was occurring, because of the total number of peaks were
reduced in 70 to 100% of their original area, independently of
the bioremediation assay.
The biosurfactants
and emulsification produced following growth of these
bacterial strains in petroleum-derived compounds demonstrate
their potential to be used in bioremediation process.
The bioremediation
assays showed that Planococcus citreus was able to
degrade the oily effluent, which is rich in diesel oil, and
capable to reduce the COD of this effluent. The treatment
using the isolated biosurfactants showed that the bacterial
biosurfactants were able to emulsify the oily compounds
present in the effluent and turned this substrate available to
microbial metabolism.
2. Acknowledgments
We thank
FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo)
for financial support.
3. Bibliography
Ali, M.F., Alqam, M.H. Fuel. 79:
1309–1316, 2000.
Àscon-Cabrera, M.A., Lebeault, J.M.
Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol.
43: 1136-1141,
1995.
Bardi, L.,
Mattei, A., Steffan, S., Marzona, M. Enzyme and Microbial
Technology. 27: 709-713, 2000.
Bognolo, G.
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering
Aspects.152: 41–52, 1999.
Choi, D.H.,
Hori, K., Tanji, Y., Unno, H. Biochemical Engineering
Jornal.3: 71-78, 1999.
Cooper, D.,
Goldenberg, B.G. Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
53: 224-229, 1997.
De¨ziel, E.,
Le¨pine, F., Dennie, D., Boismenu, D., Mamer, O. A.,
Villemur, R Biochimica et Biophysica Acta.1440:
244-252, 1999.
Esch, S.W.,
Morton, M.D., Williams, T.D., Buller, C.S. Carbohydrate
Research. 319: 112–123, 1999.
Greenberg, A.E.,
Clesceri, L.S., Eaton, A.D. Standard Methods for the
examination of Water and Wastewater. 18°ed. Washington:
American Public Health Association, 1992.
Holt, J.G.,
Krieg,N.R., Sneath, P.H.A., Staley, J.T., Williams, S.T.
Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 9º ed.
Baltimore: Willians & Wilkins, 1994.
Jansson, J.K.,
BjoÈrkloÈf, K., Elvang, A.M., Jùrgensen, K.S.
Environmental Pollution. 107: 217-223, 2000.
Johnson, V.,
Singh, M., Saini, V.S., Adhikari, D.K., Sista, V., Yadav, N.K
Biotechnology Letters, 6: 487-490, 1992.
Lin, S.,
Chen, Y., Lin, Yu. Journal of Chromatography A. 825:
149–159, 1998.
Navon-Venezia,
S., Zosim, Z., Gottlieb, A., Legmann, R., Carmeli, S., Ron,
E.Z., Rosenberg, E. Applied Environmental Microbiology.
61(9): 3240-3244, 1995.
Rocha, C.,
San-Blas, F., San-Blas, G., Vierma, L. World Journal of
Microbiology and Biotechnology.
8: 125-128, 1992.
Von Sperlins., M. Introdução à qualidade das águas e ao
tratamento de esgotos.
2ª ed. Belo
Horizonte: UFMG, 1996.
Top
|